Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing · Utah

TA Instruments Lindon, UT

Name: TA Instruments Lindon, UT Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lindon, UT · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TA Instruments Lindon, UT runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

TA Instruments Lindon, UT: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TA Instruments Lindon, UT safety composite

TA Instruments Lindon, UT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TA Instruments Lindon, UT held a steady TCR band

TA Instruments Lindon, UT's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Lindon, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #4/6
PHOTO Brea, CA
BOOK 4y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brea, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.8
Brea, CA

0.8
USA Field Forc

0.8
Extrel CMS, LL

0.8
Sierra Monitor

0.8

What this shows TA Instruments Lindon, UT averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

TA Instruments Lindon, UT TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where TA Instruments Lindon, UT falls in its industry

213 Thermal analysis instruments, establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Thermal analysis instruments, employers in Utah.

TA Instruments Lindon, UT (32 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

TA Instruments Lindon, UT has fewer employees than the Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	Injuries
2020	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0
2018	3.3	1
2017	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · UT · Lindon

213 Thermal analysis instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 43 employers in Lindon, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Brea, CA	BREA, CA	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	USA Field Force	MENLO PARK, CA	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Extrel CMS, LLC	PITTSBURGH, PA	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sierra Monitor Corporation	MILPITAS, CA	0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	00550 TERMINAL SUBSTATION	SALT LAKE CITY	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CENTRAL DAVIS SEWER DISTRICT	KAYSVILLE	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Magna Water District	MAGNA	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Omega Group Inc	OGDEN	32 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sunpro Corporation	Lindon	507 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 5270	Lindon	392 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5270	Lindon	360 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Crumbl Enterprises LLC	Lindon	329 FTE
NAT-TCR	Venado Oil and Gas LLC	Austin, TX	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Takeda California	San Diego, CA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	44837 - New Orleans Fac	Harahan, LA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	O&M Atlantis	Houston, TX	0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	REN091 St Louis	St Louis, MO	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	REN093 SE Missouri	Benton, MO	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	DGS Aviation Services : SHV - Shreveport	Shreveport, LA	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fortis Solutions Group (Memphis)	Memphis, TN	32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.