Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Georgia

TA Smith

Tucker, GA · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TA Smith runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

TA Smith: 0.6 TCR = 49% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TA Smith safety composite

TA Smith scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TA Smith held a steady TCR band

TA Smith's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Tucker, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO Westbrook Energy Cen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westbrook Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

TA Smith in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TA Smith averages 0.6 TCR (49% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TA Smith TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where TA Smith falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Electric power generation, fos employers in Georgia.

TA Smith (36 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate TA Smith
TA Smith (36 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

TA Smith has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · GA · Tucker

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 132 employers in Tucker, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westbrook Energy Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monroe Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : Sandy Creek 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Greenhouse Systems, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Stephen County hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lavonia Hatchery 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Plant Services, LLC (All Locations) 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE
NAT-TCR Kaneka North America LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D.B. Roberts, Inc.-Wilmington 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadview Product Development 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael L. Shular, D/B/A Holiday Inn Express & Suites 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE O'Neal Roofing Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Truck & Trailer Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harker Heights Facility 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automotive of York (Chambersburg) 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.