Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing · Minnesota

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing

Name: Tactile Systems - Manufacturing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

New Brighton, MN · ~67 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing safety composite

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2020

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · New Brighton, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK #32/56
PHOTO ICU SLC
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ICU SLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.4
Martech Medica

1.4
Anika Therapeu

1.4
ICU SLC

1.3
Integra CI, In

1.3

What this shows Tactile Systems - Manufacturing averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Tactile Systems - Manufacturing falls in its industry

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 56 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu employers in Minnesota.

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing (67 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tactile Systems - Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2020	4.1	1.4	2	1
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · New Brighton

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in New Brighton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	ICU SLC	SLC, UT	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Martech Medical Products, Inc.	HARLEYSVILLE, PA	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Anika Therapeutics - Sarasota - 6455	SARASOTA, FL	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Integra CI, Inc. - Anasco	ANASCO, PR	1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	MOORHEAD PUBLIC SERVICE	MOORHEAD	67 FTE
STATE-SIZE	505 Nicollet MNN3	MINNEAPOLIS	67 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SMA, LLC	CLEARWATER	67 FTE
STATE-SIZE	102809 - Moosejaw	EVELETH	67 FTE
CITY-NEAR	API Construction	New Brighton	396 FTE
CITY-NEAR	GRUMA CORPORATION	New Brighton	339 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens	New Brighton	250 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton	New Brighton	229 FTE
NAT-TCR	Borsheim Jewelry Co. Inc	Omaha, NE	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	RGB- Tempe	Tempe, AZ	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ashton Tiffany, LLC	Phoenix, AZ	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Suez Analytical Instruments	Boulder, CO	1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Woodruff Enterprises	Springfield, OH	67 FTE
NAT-SIZE	American Spoon Foods	Petoskey, MI	67 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Westin Palo Alto	Palo Alto, CA	67 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Concordia Private Care	Cabot, PA	67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.