Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing · Minnesota

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp

Minneapolis, MN · ~725 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp safety composite

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2024

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp injury rate improved

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.3 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.3 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #19/56
  • PHOTO Moog Medical Devices…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~725 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moog Medical Devices Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp TCR series: 2018=2.3 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp falls in its industry

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 56 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu employers in Minnesota.

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp (725 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp
Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp (725 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp has more employees than the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2023 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 3 0 0
2020 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 5 0 0
2018 2.3 0.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · Minneapolis

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moog Medical Devices Group 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baxter Healthcare 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Brooklyn Park 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR R92M - California 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation - Center City 725 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banner Engineering Corp 723 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Ulm 722 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottage Grove Site 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR St. John Properties Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Metal Decking of South Florida 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR VAS Aero Services 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Tomco 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Faculty Student Association of SUNY at Buffalo Inc. 725 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - FLL 725 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center 725 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.