Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing · Utah

Moog Medical Devices Group

Salt Lake City, UT · ~208 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moog Medical Devices Group runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Moog Medical Devices Group: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moog Medical Devices Group safety composite

Moog Medical Devices Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2024

Moog Medical Devices Group injury rate improved

Moog Medical Devices Group's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.6 in 2018 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/19
  • PHOTO Tactile Systems Tech…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Moog Medical Devices Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moog Medical Devices Group averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moog Medical Devices Group TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Moog Medical Devices Group falls in its industry

741 Surgical and Medical Instrumen establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 19 Surgical and Medical Instrumen employers in Utah.

Moog Medical Devices Group (208 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Moog Medical Devices Group
Moog Medical Devices Group (208 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Moog Medical Devices Group has more employees than the Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · UT · Salt Lake City

741 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tactile Systems Technology Inc Corp 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baxter Healthcare 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Brooklyn Park 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR R92M - California 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE B. Jackson Construction & Engineering, LLC - Utah 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daw Construction Group, LLC 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE IFS - UT, Provo 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZPRV 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Shipyard Brady Island 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pegasus Express Pharmacy 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Alaska Reservations 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Batesville - 0620 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITC Operations-219 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferguson Trenching Company Inc 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-ATL 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.