Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flowers and shrubbery) · California

Taisuco America Corporation

Aromas, CA · ~66 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Taisuco America Corporation runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flowers and shrubbery) workplace, earning a grade F.

Taisuco America Corporation: 14.5 TCR = 322% of Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flowers and shrubbery) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Taisuco America Corporation safety composite

Taisuco America Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Taisuco America Corporation: 10.3 → 13.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 20.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Taisuco America Corporation's TCR rose 3.6 from 10.3 in 2017 to 13.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111421 · Aromas, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 322% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #117/120
  • PHOTO Prairie Restorations…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie Restorations Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Taisuco America Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Taisuco America Corporation averages 14.5 TCR (322% of the Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flowers and shrubbery) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Taisuco America Corporation TCR series: 2017=10.3 · 2018=12.5 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=20.9 · 2022=13.3 · 2023=18.2 · 2024=13.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Taisuco America Corporation falls in its industry

386 Field nurseries (i.e., growing establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 120 Field nurseries (i.e., growing employers in California.

Taisuco America Corporation (66 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Taisuco America Corporation
Taisuco America Corporation (66 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Taisuco America Corporation has more employees than the Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flower median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.9 9.3 6 0 0
2023 18.2 8.1 7 2 0
2022 13.3 11.4 6 1 0
2021 20.9 17.4 8 4 0
2020 12.5 10.9 8 0 0
2019 14.5 13.3 12 0 0
2018 12.5 12.5 11 0 0
2017 10.3 10.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111421 · CA · Aromas

386 Field nurseries (i.e., growing of flowers and shrubbery) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 8 employers in Aromas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prairie Restorations Inc. 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTERN CACTUS GROWERS 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Planters' Choice Nursery LLC 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fireclay Tile Aromas 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fireclay Tile 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Altos Farms, LLC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
NAT-TCR MNM014 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J.L. Kent & Sons, Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tithonus Lancaster 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Industrial Manufacturing 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mesa 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alaska Directional, LLC-Palmer 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darien Fire Department 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edward Arnold Scrap Processor, Inc 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.