Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Tithonus Lancaster

Lancaster, PA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tithonus Lancaster runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Tithonus Lancaster: 14.5 TCR = 223% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tithonus Lancaster safety composite

Tithonus Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.7

2016→2024

Tithonus Lancaster injury rate improved

Tithonus Lancaster's TCR fell 17.7 from 25.7 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.7 · 2017=21.2 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=27.6 · 2023=23.4 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #658/754
  • PHOTO 9288-740
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9288-740 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tithonus Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tithonus Lancaster averages 14.5 TCR (223% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tithonus Lancaster TCR series: 2016=25.7 · 2017=21.2 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=27.6 · 2023=23.4 · 2024=8 · BLS 6.5

Where Tithonus Lancaster falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #658 safest of 754 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Pennsylvania.

Tithonus Lancaster (28 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tithonus Lancaster
Tithonus Lancaster (28 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Tithonus Lancaster has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2023 23.4 23.4 6 0 0
2022 27.6 23.0 5 1 0
2021 11.9 11.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2017 21.2 21.2 5 0 0
2016 25.7 17.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Lancaster

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9288-740 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cortland Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northgate Health Care Facility 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR University Nursing and Rehab 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Advance Industrial Manufacturing 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Taisuco America Corporation 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MNM014 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J.L. Kent & Sons, Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE POR Products, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1749 Lkq 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #112 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #93 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.