Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · Arizona

Talus Development

Phoenix, AZ · ~123 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Talus Development runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade A.

Talus Development: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Talus Development safety composite

Talus Development scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Talus Development: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Talus Development's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/47
  • PHOTO PICCo - 6300236 OG&E…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PICCo - 6300236 OG&E Sooner (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Talus Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Talus Development averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Talus Development TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Talus Development falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 47 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in Arizona.

Talus Development (123 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Talus Development
Talus Development (123 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Talus Development has more employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · AZ · Phoenix

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PICCo - 6300236 OG&E Sooner 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105778 - Cumberland Combined Cycle Plant 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RES America Construction, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DECO 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE McNeil Brothers 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Solar Energy 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryker Sustainability Solutions - 10232 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZ.PHOEN.209 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR BWC Terminals Texas City 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR G & M Earth Moving, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tracy, CA - 1005 E Pescadero Avenue 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Weston & Sampson Engineering, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AbsolutAire, Inc. 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Mechanical, LLC 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckeye Relief 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Butcher Block, Inc. dba North Country Smokehouse 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.