Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Florida

Tampa Delivery Service

Tampa, FL · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tampa Delivery Service runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Tampa Delivery Service: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tampa Delivery Service safety composite

Tampa Delivery Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2021→2022

Tampa Delivery Service injury rate improved

Tampa Delivery Service's TCR fell 3.5 from 10.1 in 2021 to 6.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.1 · 2022=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #221/437
  • PHOTO CARIV - RIVERSIDE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CARIV - RIVERSIDE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Tampa Delivery Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tampa Delivery Service averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tampa Delivery Service TCR series: 2021=10.1 · 2022=6.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Tampa Delivery Service falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #221 safest of 437 Express delivery services (exc employers in Florida.

Tampa Delivery Service (60 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Tampa Delivery Service
Tampa Delivery Service (60 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Tampa Delivery Service has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.6 6.6 3 0 0
2021 10.1 6.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · FL · Tampa

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CARIV - RIVERSIDE 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDFRE - FREDERICK 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 35300 GROSEBECK 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3150 PASEO MERCADO 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bartow Combined Cycle Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC-Cape Canaveral Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE BB1 Boynton Beach - S C Strm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Customer Service 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Northeast Methodist Hospital 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ribbon Grounds Services 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-079-Greenwood ( RK-079 ) 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Frank's Vacuum Truck Service, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acadia 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mathewson Lane 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nordic Fiberglass Inc. Warren MN 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.