Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Florida

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS)

Tampa, FL · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade A.

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS): 0.8 TCR = 33% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2021

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) injury rate improved

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO West Chester FS (SSS…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Chester FS (SSS, CSS) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) averages 0.8 TCR (33% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Florida.

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) (36 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tampa FS (SSS, CSS)
Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) (36 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · FL · Tampa

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Chester FS (SSS, CSS) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Antonio - 206 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenfield FS (SSS,CSS) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern California - 602 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Citrus Management, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Alachua 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods Lake Wales Florida 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM4 Gladiolus Service Center 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR West Chester FS (SSS, CSS) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Razorback Liquidators 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora Fleet Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Howard University - Bethune 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Universal Supply - Hammonton 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland Garage Door, Omaha, NE 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet 7711 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Atlanta 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.