Forceps, surgical, manufacturing · California

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon

San Diego, CA · ~357 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Forceps, surgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Forceps, surgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon safety composite

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #90/107
  • PHOTO Freudenberg Medical
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Freudenberg Medical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Forceps, surgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon falls in its industry

741 Forceps, surgical, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 107 Forceps, surgical, manufacturi employers in California.

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon
Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tandem Diabetes Care Inc. Barnes Canyon has more employees than the Forceps, surgical, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 2.6 9 2 0
2023 2.5 2.1 3 4 0
2022 5.6 5.6 2 19 0
2021 2.3 2.0 1 8 0
2020 3.6 2.9 6 10 0
2019 1.3 0.4 2 4 0
2018 7.5 6.0 1 9 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · CA · San Diego

741 Forceps, surgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg Medical 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health Santa Clara 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oberg Medical Chicago 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CI-EN 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Organic Gardens 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Packing & Cooling 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynasty Farm Labor Contracting 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifica Personnel, inc. 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Hard Rock Sawing and Drilling Specialists Co 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bent Glass Design Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EVANSVILLE 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fletchline Companies 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lehigh Regional Medical Center 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omega Engineering - NJ 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County Medical Center 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, LLC 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.