Street lighting fixtures (except traffic signals) manufacturing · California

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc.

San Francisco, CA · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Street lighting fixtures (except traffic signals) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Street lighting fixtures (except traffic signals) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. safety composite

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335129 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Signify Entertainment
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Signify Entertainment (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Street lighting fixtures (except traffic signals) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. falls in its industry

55 Street lighting fixtures (exce establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Street lighting fixtures (exce employers in California.

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tanko Streetlighting, Inc.
Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Street lighting fixtures (except traffic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335129 · CA · San Francisco

55 Street lighting fixtures (except traffic signals) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Signify Entertainment 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Musco Specialty Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sternberg Lighting 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Musco Sports Lighting, LLC / Corporate Office 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR TW Metals - STP 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Site Development South 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Triton Plumbing 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R. E. Monson - Britt 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nueske's Applewood Smoked Meats Store 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Wolcott- Town Hall 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE WEL-Life at Papillion 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Farms 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.