Loading and unloading services at rail terminals · Louisiana

Team Facility Services North Dakota

Baton Rouge, LA · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Team Facility Services North Dakota runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Loading and unloading services at rail terminals workplace, earning a grade B.

Team Facility Services North Dakota: 3.3 TCR = 73% of Loading and unloading services at rail terminals BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Team Facility Services North Dakota safety composite

Team Facility Services North Dakota scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2017

Team Facility Services North Dakota injury rate improved

Team Facility Services North Dakota's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488210 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Littleton BNSF - AAW
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Littleton BNSF - AAW (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Team Facility Services North Dakota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Team Facility Services North Dakota averages 3.3 TCR (73% of the Loading and unloading services at rail terminals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Team Facility Services North Dakota TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Team Facility Services North Dakota falls in its industry

409 Loading and unloading services establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Loading and unloading services employers in Louisiana.

Team Facility Services North Dakota (37 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Team Facility Services North Dakota
Team Facility Services North Dakota (37 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Team Facility Services North Dakota has fewer employees than the Loading and unloading services at rail t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488210 · LA · Baton Rouge

409 Loading and unloading services at rail terminals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Littleton BNSF - AAW 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mingo Junction Terminal 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WMS Neodesha 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTC Railcar Repair Services - Texarkana, AR 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timberland Services, LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Bros. General Contractors- Shreveport 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE ENTERGY LLC NORTH BLVD 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Southern Region Office Destrehan 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR 3344 Family Fresh Market (Hudson Wi) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - SGF 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur (Aldec) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainville Community Schools Linden Street Elementary 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clarion Suites 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0337 - Hempstead, Ny 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0225 - Mc Allen, Tx 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0093 - Springfield, Mo 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.