Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · California

Team Ghilotti, Inc

Petaluma, CA · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Team Ghilotti, Inc runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade C.

Team Ghilotti, Inc: 2.7 TCR = 97% of Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Team Ghilotti, Inc safety composite

Team Ghilotti, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2018→2024

Team Ghilotti, Inc injury rate improved

Team Ghilotti, Inc's TCR fell 11.3 from 11.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Petaluma, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #395/551
  • PHOTO Heavy Grade
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heavy Grade (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Team Ghilotti, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Team Ghilotti, Inc averages 2.7 TCR (97% of the Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Team Ghilotti, Inc TCR series: 2018=11.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Team Ghilotti, Inc falls in its industry

4,078 Surfacing, highway, road, stre establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #395 safest of 551 Surfacing, highway, road, stre employers in California.

Team Ghilotti, Inc (59 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Team Ghilotti, Inc
Team Ghilotti, Inc (59 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Team Ghilotti, Inc has fewer employees than the Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2018 11.3 8.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Petaluma

4,078 Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heavy Grade 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rieth-Riley - Indianapolis 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stutz Excavating, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jerdon Enterprise LP 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Kimpton Hotel New Orleans 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosepine Retirement 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Napoleon, OH 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pan American Properties-Amelia/Venta 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Legend of Lititz 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SD Industries LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBS Houston 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tobar Construction, Incorporated 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.