Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant wholesalers · Texas

Tech Data Ft Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~165 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tech Data Ft Worth runs at 384% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Tech Data Ft Worth: 8.4 TCR = 384% of Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tech Data Ft Worth safety composite

Tech Data Ft Worth scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tech Data Ft Worth held a steady TCR band

Tech Data Ft Worth's TCR held near 0.2 from 7.4 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423430 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 384% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Tech Data Fontana
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tech Data Fontana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tech Data Ft Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tech Data Ft Worth averages 8.4 TCR (384% of the Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tech Data Ft Worth TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=7.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Tech Data Ft Worth falls in its industry

118 Peripheral equipment, computer establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Peripheral equipment, computer employers in Texas.

Tech Data Ft Worth (165 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tech Data Ft Worth
Tech Data Ft Worth (165 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Tech Data Ft Worth has more employees than the Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.6 5.7 8 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2020 10.8 9.9 13 0 0
2019 11.7 11.1 18 1 0
2018 14.1 11.7 23 1 0
2017 3.8 3.8 8 0 0
2016 7.4 6.4 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423430 · TX · Fort Worth

118 Peripheral equipment, computer, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tech Data Fontana 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDK - Norwood 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tech Data South Bend 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tech Data Swedesboro 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PDD-Baird Ct. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG HOU 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Field Services at Eastman Chemical Company 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE OQ Chemicals Corporation Bay City TX 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Maxton Sherwood Park 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Domino's SCC- Connecticut 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 406770-Por-Creston Sta 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 314894-Las-Paradise Valley Sta 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 0202 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730147-FO-SW 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency a Villa Center 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pike Company 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.