Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive

Jackson, MI · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive: 1.2 TCR = 22% of Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive safety composite

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2024

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2023 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Jackson, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 22% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #29/146
  • PHOTO Fuel Total Systems T…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fuel Total Systems Tennessee, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technique, Inc. Micor Drive averages 1.2 TCR (22% of the Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Technique, Inc. Micor Drive falls in its industry

772 Exhaust and tail pipes, automo establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 146 Exhaust and tail pipes, automo employers in Michigan.

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Technique, Inc. Micor Drive
Technique, Inc. Micor Drive (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Technique, Inc. Micor Drive has fewer employees than the Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · MI · Jackson

772 Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 207 employers in Jackson, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fuel Total Systems Tennessee, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR US MI Zeeland 58 Riley St 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenneco Automotive Operating Company 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegiance Health 4,779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Hospital Campus 3,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Jackson 2,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Jackson Downtown Campus 1,201 FTE
NAT-TCR Hanford CA 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Total Turf Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crux Subsurface 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR J.F. Edwards Construction Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bissell Mexico inc Pharr 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott County Public Works (includes Belle Plaine Shop) 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Lumber Corrigan, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Central Virginia 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.