Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Ohio

TECT Power Cleveland

Cleveland, OH · ~93 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TECT Power Cleveland runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

TECT Power Cleveland: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TECT Power Cleveland safety composite

TECT Power Cleveland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TECT Power Cleveland: 2.1 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2017

TECT Power Cleveland's TCR rose 3.3 from 2.1 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #45/46
  • PHOTO Barnes Aerospace Eas…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barnes Aerospace East Granby Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

TECT Power Cleveland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TECT Power Cleveland averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TECT Power Cleveland TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where TECT Power Cleveland falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 46 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Ohio.

TECT Power Cleveland (93 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate TECT Power Cleveland
TECT Power Cleveland (93 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

TECT Power Cleveland has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.4 4.5 6 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OH · Cleveland

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barnes Aerospace East Granby Division 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Tool 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welded Ring Products Co. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 1 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 914-NiSource-Lorain OH-North Pointe Op Ctr 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jostin Construction, INC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Control Integrators, LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Office/Plant 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #130 (River Falls, WI) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Nursing and Rehab 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Greene Haven LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forsyth Manor Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 242 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Services Supply Chain Operations : Hanover Park, IL 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.