Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing · California

Teledyne Analytical Instruments

City of Industry, CA · ~98 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Teledyne Analytical Instruments runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Teledyne Analytical Instruments: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Teledyne Analytical Instruments safety composite

Teledyne Analytical Instruments scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Teledyne Analytical Instruments: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Teledyne Analytical Instruments's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · City of Industry, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #17/27
  • PHOTO Dwyer Instruments In…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dwyer Instruments Inc - Hazel Park MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Teledyne Analytical Instruments in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Teledyne Analytical Instruments averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Teledyne Analytical Instruments TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.7 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Teledyne Analytical Instruments falls in its industry

322 Gas analyzers, industrial proc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 27 Gas analyzers, industrial proc employers in California.

Teledyne Analytical Instruments (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Teledyne Analytical Instruments
Teledyne Analytical Instruments (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Teledyne Analytical Instruments has more employees than the Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.7 4.3 4 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · CA · City of Industry

322 Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 226 employers in City of Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dwyer Instruments Inc - Hazel Park MI 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miljoco Corp LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technology for Energy Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR E+H Optical Analysis Rancho Cucamonga 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal GVIC Ranches 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapala Berry Farms 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag-Wise Enterprises, Inc 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bains Orchards Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow-Meadows Corporation 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR 050109-INDUSTRY CA P&DC 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDUSTRY_1441491 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kellwood Apparel, LLC 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Kramski North America Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR K.K. Stevens Publishing Co. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pulaski Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ragnar Events LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haven Steel Products 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harmony Village at Careone Stanwick Road 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inventory Trading Company 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cal-Tex Electric, Inc. 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.