Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Pennsylvania

Tenaris Ambridge

Ambridge, PA · ~115 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tenaris Ambridge runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Tenaris Ambridge: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tenaris Ambridge safety composite

Tenaris Ambridge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tenaris Ambridge: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Tenaris Ambridge's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Ambridge, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #4/32
  • PHOTO VAM USA Youngstown
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VAM USA Youngstown (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tenaris Ambridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tenaris Ambridge averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tenaris Ambridge TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=2 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Tenaris Ambridge falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 32 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Pennsylvania.

Tenaris Ambridge (115 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tenaris Ambridge
Tenaris Ambridge (115 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Tenaris Ambridge has more employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · PA · Ambridge

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 20 employers in Ambridge, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VAM USA Youngstown 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Elbow 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vallourec Tube Alloy Richey 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaris Baytown 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade's Greenhouses, Inc. - Lititz 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE WNDOB Windsor Office Building 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Hills Service Center 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael F. Ronca & Sons, Inc. 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR R. J. Rhodes Transit, Inc. 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sippel Co., Inc. dba Sippel Steel Fab 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ambridge 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEEMAC INC 111 FTE
NAT-TCR BlueCore Power LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Electronics, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hmf Express Ilm 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lumin8 Transportation Technologies, LLC. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of North Mankato 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkview Hospital 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rose & a Flc 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Tier Brewing - Lakewood Brewery 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.