Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Oklahoma

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station

Kiowa, OK · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station safety composite

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Kiowa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/33
  • PHOTO Kennedy Internationa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kennedy International Airport Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 33 Electric power generation, fos employers in Oklahoma.

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station
Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OK · Kiowa

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kennedy International Airport Power Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00556 LAYTONDAVIS OFF 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : Astoria 1 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sebree Station 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sesaco 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Feeders LLC dba Henry C Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Area Office 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast District Service Cen 36 FTE
NAT-TCR MAPEI Dalton #1 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondi 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanxess Corporation-RheinChemie Additives 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dermalogica 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gypsum Wholesalers, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterloo Water Works 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Quality Science Building 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jennmar Corporation of Virginia inc. Specialty Products 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.