Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · New York

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant

Jamaica, NY · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant safety composite

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant injury rate improved

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Jamaica, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/29
  • PHOTO Tenaska Kiamichi Gen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kennedy International Airport Power Plant averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Kennedy International Airport Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 29 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in New York.

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant (30 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kennedy International Airport Power Plant
Kennedy International Airport Power Plant (30 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Kennedy International Airport Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Jamaica

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 222 employers in Jamaica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00556 LAYTONDAVIS OFF 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : Astoria 1 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sebree Station 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hemdale Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE My Forest Foods 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Part 2 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.W. Patterson, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK Kennedy Airport 5,815 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jamaica Hospital Medical Center 3,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFKPW9832 JFK - PASSENGER SERV 3,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR DO & CO New York Catering Inc 1,694 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Wine Corp. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NW Division 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-County Electric Company, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Knowles Industrial Services Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE York Energy Center 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hickory Hky 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dvj- Vi Jon 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.