Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing · Tennessee

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.

Knoxville, TN · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. safety composite

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Knoxville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/8
  • PHOTO Fluid Systems
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fluid Systems (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. falls in its industry

242 Aircraft carrier catapults man establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 Aircraft carrier catapults man employers in Tennessee.

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.
Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Tennessee Automatic Sprinkler, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · TN · Knoxville

242 Aircraft carrier catapults manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 747 employers in Knoxville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fluid Systems 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amh-300 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Medical, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sartorius 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE RIVERSIDE FUQUA FARMS LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA - Nashville Sod Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Warren-Viola Utility District 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 268BG Rutherford County 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cellular Sales Services Group LLC 6,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Functional Pathways of TN LLC 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services K-12 2,157 FTE
NAT-TCR Burrow Global Services, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Skies Electric, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frith Construction Company, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Vehicle Logistics - OHAP 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.