Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Tennessee

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City

Union City, TN · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City: 4.4 TCR = 210% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City safety composite

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City held a steady TCR band

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=9.0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Union City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.4 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/67
  • PHOTO MH Dubuque
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MH Dubuque (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City averages 4.4 TCR (210% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=9 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 67 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Tennessee.

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City (23 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City
Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City (23 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Tennessee Tractor, LLC - Union City has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 9.0 4.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TN · Union City

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 44 employers in Union City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MH Dubuque 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Field Services/Sales 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vermeer of Michigan, Inc - Fowlerville 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cross Implement - Minier 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manchester DREMC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDE - Metro Nashville District Energy System 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avenue Construction 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Obion County Plant 1,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Sausage 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickman Road Plant 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Union City 335 FTE
NAT-TCR C&F Enterprises LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lilburn, Ga #00148 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Yankee Fiber Control, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5406 Albany, GA 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gartner Equipment Co. Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake City UT - 1760 N 2200 W Suite #30 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chalfont - Mark1 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 101 - Orange Branch 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.