Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp.

Hudson, MA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp.: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. safety composite

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. held a steady TCR band

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Hudson, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO OK4 CHANDLER ENGINEE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OK4 CHANDLER ENGINEERING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. falls in its industry

128 Fatigue testing machines, indu establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Fatigue testing machines, indu employers in Massachusetts.

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. (37 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp.
Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. (37 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Test Devices, Business Unit of Schenck USA Corp. has fewer employees than the Fatigue testing machines, industrial, me median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · MA · Hudson

128 Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 36 employers in Hudson, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OK4 CHANDLER ENGINEERING 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJ34 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Panel Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinemont 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Danvers, Electric Division 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE MIDDLESEX GASES & TECHNOLOGIES, INC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Builders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core Concepts Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hudson Campus 788 FTE
CITY-NEAR S&F Concrete Contractors Corporation 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #73 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1970 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Behler-Young Company - Grand Rapids 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sturm Foods Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oxford Properties, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Subaru 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Resource 4 Floors 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Leonardwood 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ring Container Jefferson 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wild By Nature #203 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.