Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Tetra Pak Materials LLC

Denton, TX · ~224 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tetra Pak Materials LLC runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Tetra Pak Materials LLC: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tetra Pak Materials LLC safety composite

Tetra Pak Materials LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Tetra Pak Materials LLC injury rate improved

Tetra Pak Materials LLC's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Denton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Dallas Distribution …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dallas Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tetra Pak Materials LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tetra Pak Materials LLC averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tetra Pak Materials LLC TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Tetra Pak Materials LLC falls in its industry

236 Cards, die-cut (except office establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Cards, die-cut (except office employers in Texas.

Tetra Pak Materials LLC (224 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tetra Pak Materials LLC
Tetra Pak Materials LLC (224 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Tetra Pak Materials LLC has more employees than the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.3 5 1 0
2023 3.0 2.3 9 0 0
2022 1.3 0.3 3 1 0
2021 1.9 1.5 4 1 0
2020 3.0 2.6 6 1 0
2019 2.9 2.5 6 1 0
2018 3.1 3.1 7 0 0
2017 1.9 1.5 4 0 0
2016 2.6 1.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · TX · Denton

236 Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dallas Distribution Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixon Ticonderoga Company 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manchester Industries Dallas 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Beistle Company 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Navasota 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beyer Construction 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLN Company 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX-01 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Motors Company 2,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
NAT-TCR KS Dodge City 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Administrative Services 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eversource - Railroad Hill Street 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 698 - East Ontario 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Dental Technologies 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1384 - Bakersfield NW 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1892 - Raleigh Central 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2179 - Diamond Bar 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.