Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing · California

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320

Gardena, CA · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320: 9.1 TCR = 275% of Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 safety composite

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2023→2024

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 injury rate improved

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320's TCR fell 0.5 from 9.3 in 2023 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=9.3 · 2024=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335991 · Gardena, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 275% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO Kaman Composites - V…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaman Composites - Vermont (1.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 averages 9.1 TCR (275% of the Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 TCR series: 2023=9.3 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 falls in its industry

93 Fibers, carbon and graphite, m establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Fibers, carbon and graphite, m employers in California.

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 (61 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320
Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 (61 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Tex-Tech Engineered Composites, LLC313320 has fewer employees than the Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 8.8 6 0 0
2023 9.3 7.4 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335991 · CA · Gardena

93 Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 223 employers in Gardena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaman Composites - Vermont 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Carbon Technologies, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Graphite KY 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composite Approach 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silveira Farms 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Brucherie Produce, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olds Ranch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 602 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-030 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR GARDENA HUB (CAGAR) 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAGAR - GARDENA HUB 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohspf - Springfield Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gary Poppins 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Garfield Memorial Hospital Nursing Care Facility 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartland corn Products 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joy-Mark, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Control Home Services 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandywine Construction Co., Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.