Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills · Texas

Texas Landfill Management

Buda, TX · ~97 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas Landfill Management runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills workplace, earning a grade C.

Texas Landfill Management: 3.0 TCR = 113% of Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas Landfill Management safety composite

Texas Landfill Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Texas Landfill Management: 1.0 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2021

Texas Landfill Management's TCR rose 4.9 from 1.0 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Buda, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 113% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #22/30
  • PHOTO TESSMAN ROAD LANDFILL
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TESSMAN ROAD LANDFILL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas Landfill Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas Landfill Management averages 3.0 TCR (113% of the Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas Landfill Management TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=5.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Texas Landfill Management falls in its industry

288 Refuse collecting and operatin establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 30 Refuse collecting and operatin employers in Texas.

Texas Landfill Management (97 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas Landfill Management
Texas Landfill Management (97 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Texas Landfill Management has more employees than the Refuse collecting and operating solid wa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.9 5.9 14 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 0 1 0
2017 4.4 4.4 2 1 0
2016 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · TX · Buda

288 Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 55 employers in Buda, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TESSMAN ROAD LANDFILL 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05362 - Palmdale Disposal 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04108 - Simi Valley Landfill and Recycling Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Waste Services of Texas LTD 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE US Energy Development Corporation 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE ES/Well Services Division - 03 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Humble 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Betenbough Business Services 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS Austin 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAPITAL EXCAVATION COMPANY 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4219 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DAU5 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Lowell Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #067 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rose City Manufacturing 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ambassador Steel-Bourbonnais Illinois 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Textile Service Inc 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 54-Usf-S&H Pike & Rose 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE LEM Indianapolis 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 40226-Capstone Albertsons Portland or 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.