Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · Texas

Texas Port Recycling

Houston, TX · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas Port Recycling runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Texas Port Recycling: 0.9 TCR = 43% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas Port Recycling safety composite

Texas Port Recycling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Texas Port Recycling injury rate improved

Texas Port Recycling's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/101
  • PHOTO CMC Recycling Austin
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMC Recycling Austin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas Port Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas Port Recycling averages 0.9 TCR (43% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas Port Recycling TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Texas Port Recycling falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 101 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in Texas.

Texas Port Recycling (57 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas Port Recycling
Texas Port Recycling (57 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Texas Port Recycling has more employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · TX · Houston

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMC Recycling Austin 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMM Group Johnston Facility 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana Scrap Metal Recycling-Port Allen 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encore Recyclers,Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Terre Haute 10265 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NOVA Commercial Interiors, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jtekt North America 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Manufacturing, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delphi Construction Inc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Enclave of Scarborough 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grob Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Country Lumber CO., Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.