Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

Texas Precision Plating

Garland, TX · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas Precision Plating runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Texas Precision Plating: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas Precision Plating safety composite

Texas Precision Plating scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2024

Texas Precision Plating injury rate improved

Texas Precision Plating's TCR fell 6.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Garland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/43
  • PHOTO Wolverine Plating Co…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wolverine Plating Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas Precision Plating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas Precision Plating averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas Precision Plating TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=4 · 2018=8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Texas Precision Plating falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 43 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Texas.

Texas Precision Plating (43 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas Precision Plating
Texas Precision Plating (43 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Texas Precision Plating has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.0 0.0 4 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2016 6.0 6.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · TX · Garland

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wolverine Plating Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schumacher 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teikuro Ohio 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EHC Kostner 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timpson Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midkiff Farmers Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Paso Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR TPA2 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DYN9 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HCA Florida South Tampa Hospital 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Coldliner Express, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Twenty3 Logistics Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE CC AKS Steel 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HSF9 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deere Corporation 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.