Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Michigan

Wolverine Plating Corporation

Name: Wolverine Plating Corporation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Roseville, MI · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolverine Plating Corporation runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Wolverine Plating Corporation: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolverine Plating Corporation safety composite

Wolverine Plating Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
DART rate: F 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wolverine Plating Corporation held a steady TCR band

Wolverine Plating Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.2 in 2022 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.2 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Roseville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

DART 3.2 DART
RANK #14/48
PHOTO Texas Precision Plat…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Texas Precision Plating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.2
Texas Precisio

3.2
Schumacher

3.2
Teikuro Ohio

3.1
EHC Kostner

3.1

What this shows Wolverine Plating Corporation averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Wolverine Plating Corporation TCR series: 2022=3.2 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Wolverine Plating Corporation falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 48 Electroplating metals and form employers in Michigan.

Wolverine Plating Corporation (57 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Wolverine Plating Corporation has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	3.2	3.2	2	0	0
2022	3.2	3.2	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MI · Roseville

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Texas Precision Plating	GARLAND, TX	3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Schumacher	HOUSTON, TX	3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Teikuro Ohio	SPRINGFIELD, OH	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	EHC Kostner	CHICAGO, IL	3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bloomingdale MI Facility	BLOOMINGDALE	57 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Greenville SC	GREENVILLE	57 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Dickinson Homes	KINGSFORD	57 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Concraft Inc	AUBURN HILLS	57 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4003 - TPG/PBM	Roseville	666 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009)	Roseville	565 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2959	Roseville	446 FTE
CITY-NEAR	RCO Engineering, Inc.	Roseville	417 FTE
NAT-TCR	International Paper	Anaheim, CA	3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Plattsburgh #168	Plattsburgh, NY	3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Auburndale	Auburndale, FL	3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Compassus - Green Bay	Green Bay, WI	3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	FleetLogix NM	Albuquerque, NM	57 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Terrace at Denison	Denison, TX	57 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lynchburg Svc Ctr	Lynchburg, VA	57 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Reich Tool & Design	Menomonee Falls, WI	57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.