Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) · Arizona

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering

Mesa, AZ · ~400 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) workplace, earning a grade B.

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering safety composite

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2021

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering injury rate improved

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.1 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.2 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #12/18
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~400 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy Airport Blvd (5209) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Textron Aviation - Able Engineering averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.2 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Textron Aviation - Able Engineering falls in its industry

390 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., res establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 18 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., res employers in Arizona.

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering (400 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Textron Aviation - Able Engineering
Textron Aviation - Able Engineering (400 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Textron Aviation - Able Engineering has more employees than the Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.7 1.1 6 0 0
2020 3.6 0.6 6 0 0
2018 3.2 3.0 14 0 0
2017 1.4 0.7 5 1 0
2016 2.1 0.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · AZ · Mesa

390 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy Airport Blvd (5209) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCO Aerospace Products, LLC. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulfstream Aerospace 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell - Broussard Panel 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Phoenix F10 PDD 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5031 399 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1533 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1230 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation (272-CAL3) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Paslin - Cherry Creek 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HES Louisville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Denso Air Systems Kentucky Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutter Coast Hospital (410-010) 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE DPAM-LB 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZMAD 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZGRW 400 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.