Packaging machinery manufacturing · Missouri

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC

Washington, MO · ~98 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC safety composite

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC injury rate improved

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Washington, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Better Packages Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Better Packages Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC falls in its industry

269 Packaging machinery manufactur establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Packaging machinery manufactur employers in Missouri.

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC (98 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC
Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC (98 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC has more employees than the Packaging machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2021 3.3 1.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.7 0.9 4 0 0
2016 2.6 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · MO · Washington

269 Packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 62 employers in Washington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Better Packages Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson-Sharp 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massman Automation Design 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDL Massman LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centric Projects LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. Berra Construction Co., Inc. 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #22 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gerstner Electric, Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL WASHINGTON 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Instrumentation : Washington SPO215 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO215 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 398 FTE
NAT-TCR QSI Timberville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CB Sun Prairie 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4133 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pasadena TX 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kemper House Strongsville 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Valley Health & Rehab 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson CO 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - East Hampton 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.