Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

The Alternative Living Group, Inc.

Albany, NY · ~382 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

The Alternative Living Group, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. safety composite

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2020

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. injury rate improved

The Alternative Living Group, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Albany, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #79/336
  • PHOTO The Brookwood Commun…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~382 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Brookwood Community, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Alternative Living Group, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Alternative Living Group, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. (382 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Alternative Living Group, Inc.
The Alternative Living Group, Inc. (382 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

The Alternative Living Group, Inc. has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 1.0 5 0 0
2019 3.7 1.6 7 0 0
2018 4.3 1.4 6 0 0
2016 3.0 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Albany

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 391 employers in Albany, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Brookwood Community, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - Adams St. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakota Alpha 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-482491 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE YCC 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgemont 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE SHOPRITE OF GATEWAY CENTER #289 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1993 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany Medical Center Hospital 6,133 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ St. Peter's Hospital 4,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital- Albany 3,868 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital-Albany-SPHP-NY 3,549 FTE
NAT-TCR Gage Bilt Michigan 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulane Lakeside Campus 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sea Pro Boats, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Insul-Con Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AK Steel - Mansfield Works 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loyola Center for Health 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHCGILCL 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munch Supply 382 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.