Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations · New York

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler

Elmira, NY · ~556 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade F.

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler: 5.8 TCR = 279% of Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler safety composite

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler: 2.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler's TCR rose 4.3 from 2.0 in 2021 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813311 · Elmira, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 279% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Desert Area Resource…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~556 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Desert Area Resources and Training (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler averages 5.8 TCR (279% of the Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler TCR series: 2021=2 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 2.1

Where The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler falls in its industry

33 Developmentally disabled advoc establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Developmentally disabled advoc employers in New York.

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler (556 employees, TCR 5.8) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler
The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler (556 employees, TCR 5.8) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5

The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler has more employees than the Developmentally disabled advocacy organi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 2.3 29 1 0
2023 1.9 1.9 9 0 0
2022 13.2 0.8 52 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813311 · NY · Elmira

33 Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 88 employers in Elmira, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Desert Area Resources and Training 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cylar House 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR YFT-Bristow (HQ) 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilton Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 556 FTE
STATE-SIZE CookUnity, Inc 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Resources for Independence 555 FTE
STATE-SIZE 330 Community Dr 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnot Ogden Medical Center 2,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePuy Synthes Horseheads 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemung Canal Trust Company 379 FTE
NAT-TCR Wil Fischer Distributing of St. Joseph 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Patriot Steel Works, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Boonesboro Trail 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SCK9 556 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tristar Greenview Regional Hospital 556 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabinetworks Group Middlefield Plant #3 Orwell 556 FTE
NAT-SIZE Time Manufacturing Company 556 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.