Intellectually and developmentally disabled advocacy groups · Massachusetts

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts

Fitchburg, MA · ~250 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectually and developmentally disabled advocacy groups workplace, earning a grade F.

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts: 5.1 TCR = 244% of Intellectually and developmentally disabled advocacy groups BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts safety composite

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts: 3.9 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2019

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts's TCR rose 2.4 from 3.9 in 2018 to 6.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813311 · Fitchburg, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.1 · 244% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK P27
  • PHOTO YFT-Bristow (HQ)
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: YFT-Bristow (HQ) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts averages 5.1 TCR (244% of the Intellectually and developmentally disabled advocacy groups BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2019=6.3 · BLS 2.1

Where The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts falls in its industry

33 Intellectually and development establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts (250 employees, TCR 5.1) among 20 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts
The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts (250 employees, TCR 5.1) among 20 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5

The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts has fewer employees than the Intellectually and developmentally disab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.3 4.1 14 0 0
2018 3.9 1.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813311 · MA · Fitchburg

33 Intellectually and developmentally disabled advocacy groups employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 46 employers in Fitchburg, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR YFT-Bristow (HQ) 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cylar House 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desert Area Resources and Training 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arc of Chemung-Schuyler 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andover healthcare inc. 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Breads Inc. 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHH - Baystate Home Health 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulfstream Aerospace Services Corp 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #14 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORKERS CREDIT UNION 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR the highlands 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #27 189 FTE
NAT-TCR Phoenix Inns Salem 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ziegler's Ace Elgin East 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DPI Specialty Foods - Mid Atlantic 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CHC of Williamsburg 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE PPC - Eugene 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Knickerbocker 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1969-FC1 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Jet Inc. 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.