Fiber optic cable transmission line construction · Texas

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC

Richmond, TX · ~228 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fiber optic cable transmission line construction workplace, earning a grade A.

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Fiber optic cable transmission line construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC safety composite

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2022

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Richmond, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #52/161
  • PHOTO CMS Wireless
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMS Wireless (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Aspen Utility Company, LLC averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Fiber optic cable transmission line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where The Aspen Utility Company, LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Fiber optic cable transmission establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 161 Fiber optic cable transmission employers in Texas.

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC (228 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Aspen Utility Company, LLC
The Aspen Utility Company, LLC (228 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

The Aspen Utility Company, LLC has more employees than the Fiber optic cable transmission line cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.2 0.5 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Richmond

1,605 Fiber optic cable transmission line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 72 employers in Richmond, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMS Wireless 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7102106 DUKE Pisgah Ridge 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PraXel Line Services 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knife River Corporation South Waco 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nelson Bros. Ready Mix, Ltd. 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Roofing, LP 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beard Integrated Systems 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU6 2,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAkbend Medical Center-Jackson Street Hospital Campus 814 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center- Williams Way Hospital Campus 676 FTE
NAT-TCR 4th Avenue 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Nest 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkwood Estates 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 60TT 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Symphony Of Morgan Park 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0307 - Nashua Nh Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1183 - Mishawaka in Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1175 - Cumming Ga Whse 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.