Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) · Minnesota

The Bernard Group (TBG1)

Chanhassen, MN · ~321 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bernard Group (TBG1) runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) workplace, earning a grade B.

The Bernard Group (TBG1): 2.2 TCR = 66% of Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bernard Group (TBG1) safety composite

The Bernard Group (TBG1) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Bernard Group (TBG1): 1.6 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2023

The Bernard Group (TBG1)'s TCR rose 1.2 from 1.6 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Chanhassen, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #32/121
  • PHOTO Block Graphics -1
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~321 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Block Graphics -1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Bernard Group (TBG1) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bernard Group (TBG1) averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bernard Group (TBG1) TCR series: 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where The Bernard Group (TBG1) falls in its industry

2,001 Digital printing (e.g., billbo establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 121 Digital printing (e.g., billbo employers in Minnesota.

The Bernard Group (TBG1) (321 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bernard Group (TBG1)
The Bernard Group (TBG1) (321 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

The Bernard Group (TBG1) has more employees than the Digital printing (e.g., billboards, othe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 1.7 10 0 0
2022 1.6 0.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MN · Chanhassen

2,001 Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 65 employers in Chanhassen, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Block Graphics -1 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Argent Tape and Label 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graphic Village 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precise Corporate Printing, Inc 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis - Downtown 230 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0100 - Ridgedale 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1861 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWCO Chanhassen 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHANHASSEN 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR TBG2 350 FTE
NAT-TCR Kimball Main Street Market 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Vista 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dendreon Pharmaceuticals - Union City 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AB Mauri Cedar Rapids 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE VMS Vancouver 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwich Ct Plant 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plymouth Harbor 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bios Corporate Office 321 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.