Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) · Minnesota

The Bernard Group (TBG2)

Chanhassen, MN · ~350 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bernard Group (TBG2) runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) workplace, earning a grade C.

The Bernard Group (TBG2): 2.7 TCR = 82% of Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bernard Group (TBG2) safety composite

The Bernard Group (TBG2) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2022→2023

The Bernard Group (TBG2) injury rate improved

The Bernard Group (TBG2)'s TCR fell 1.1 from 3.3 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.3 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Chanhassen, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #47/121
  • PHOTO ANRO
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ANRO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Bernard Group (TBG2) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bernard Group (TBG2) averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bernard Group (TBG2) TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where The Bernard Group (TBG2) falls in its industry

2,001 Digital printing (e.g., billbo establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 121 Digital printing (e.g., billbo employers in Minnesota.

The Bernard Group (TBG2) (350 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bernard Group (TBG2)
The Bernard Group (TBG2) (350 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

The Bernard Group (TBG2) has more employees than the Digital printing (e.g., billboards, othe median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 2.2 8 0 0
2022 3.3 2.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MN · Chanhassen

2,001 Digital printing (e.g., billboards, other large format graphic materials, high resolution) (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 65 employers in Chanhassen, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ANRO 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mittera - Reno 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR StorterChilds Printing 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BLUE SPRINGS PLANT 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Saint Paul Department of Public Works 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE TBG2 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medtronic Brooklyn Park 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities Co-op Partners 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWCO Chanhassen 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHANHASSEN 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR TBG1 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamden Markets LLC, dba ShopRite of Hamden 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR All-Phase Electric Supply (PC0946) 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR K.W. Zellers & Son, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingspan Insulated Panels Deland 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freshway 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Irving 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE ContiTech 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.