Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

The Bristal Assisted Living

Sayville, NY · ~106 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bristal Assisted Living runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Bristal Assisted Living: 5.6 TCR = 146% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bristal Assisted Living safety composite

The Bristal Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2020→2022

The Bristal Assisted Living injury rate improved

The Bristal Assisted Living's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.8 in 2020 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.8 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sayville, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #123/283
  • PHOTO Peregrine Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Bristal Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bristal Assisted Living averages 5.6 TCR (146% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bristal Assisted Living TCR series: 2020=4.8 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Bristal Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

The Bristal Assisted Living (106 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bristal Assisted Living
The Bristal Assisted Living (106 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Bristal Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2021 7.6 7.6 4 0 0
2020 4.8 3.2 2 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Sayville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 13 employers in Sayville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterstone at Lexington 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caswell House 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Peoria 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayne County Eggs LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consigli Construction NY, LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 482310 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE J Track 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2847 - Sayville 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lovin Oven Catering of Suffolk LLC 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sayville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luxor Nursing and Rehabilitation at Sayville 217 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Mansfield Univ of Pennsylvania 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pump and Meter Hopkins MN 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockridge Academy 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 0320 - Union Nj Whse 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Eden NC 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT-NC-BUTNER 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE WellBridge of Brighton 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE el super #51 san diego 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.