Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Missouri

The Bungalows at Springfield East

Springfield, MO · ~20 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bungalows at Springfield East runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Bungalows at Springfield East: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bungalows at Springfield East safety composite

The Bungalows at Springfield East scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2021→2024

The Bungalows at Springfield East injury rate improved

The Bungalows at Springfield East's TCR fell 5.1 from 15.2 in 2021 to 10.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=15.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #67/106
  • PHOTO 10578
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10578 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

The Bungalows at Springfield East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bungalows at Springfield East averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bungalows at Springfield East TCR series: 2021=15.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Bungalows at Springfield East falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 106 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Missouri.

The Bungalows at Springfield East (20 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bungalows at Springfield East
The Bungalows at Springfield East (20 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Bungalows at Springfield East has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 5.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 15.2 15.2 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MO · Springfield

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10578 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodbridge Place 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portola Gardens 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter Place 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CoverCress INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE RUCKMAN #9 - 16 & 27 -EST 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek Pig, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newport Farms, LLC. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR Allesco Industries, Inc., dba Eastern Screw 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2099 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ionia County 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HPX3 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moore Lumber & Hardware Bennett 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peck Park CC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Farms- Fredericksburg, VA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Forest Grove Public Works 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.