Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Portola Gardens

Name: Portola Gardens Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

San Francisco, CA · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portola Gardens runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Portola Gardens: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portola Gardens safety composite

Portola Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 6.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2018→2023

Portola Gardens injury rate improved

Portola Gardens's TCR fell 4.4 from 8.5 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.5 · 2023=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #155/635
PHOTO The Bungalows at Spr…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Bungalows at Springfield East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.3
The Bungalows

6.3
10578

6.3
Woodbridge Pla

6.3
Porter Place

6.3

What this shows Portola Gardens averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Portola Gardens TCR series: 2018=8.5 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Portola Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Portola Gardens (42 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Portola Gardens has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	4.1	0.0	1	0	0
2018	8.5	2.8	3	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Francisco

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	The Bungalows at Springfield East	SPRINGFIELD, MO	6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	10578	SUNNYVALE, CA	6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Woodbridge Place	PHOENIXVILLE, PA	6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Porter Place	DENVER, CO	6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Quad H	ROBBINS	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CJJ Farming, Inc	SANTA MARIA	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Oceano Packing Company LLC	OCENAO	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Connell Ranch	WATSONVILLE	42 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC San Francisco	San Francisco	18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR	DoorDash, Inc.	San Francisco	12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC San Francisco Health	San Francisco	12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices	San Francisco	11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR	Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington	Burlington, WI	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Stop & Shop 100494	Foxboro, MA	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Washington-Lexington	New York, NY	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sandwich RHCC	Sandwich, IL	6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Lighting Resources USA Inc	Deland, FL	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	CCI	St Louis, MO	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Kruczek Construction Inc.	Green Bay, WI	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Quality Mechanical Corporation	East Haven, CT	42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.