Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard · Ohio

The Chilcote Company

Cleveland, OH · ~119 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Chilcote Company runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

The Chilcote Company: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Chilcote Company safety composite

The Chilcote Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Chilcote Company: 0.9 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2023

The Chilcote Company's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #10/17
  • PHOTO West Monroe LA Plant…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Monroe LA Plant 15 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Chilcote Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Chilcote Company averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Chilcote Company TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where The Chilcote Company falls in its industry

205 Folding paper and paperboard c establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 17 Folding paper and paperboard c employers in Ohio.

The Chilcote Company (119 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Chilcote Company
The Chilcote Company (119 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

The Chilcote Company has fewer employees than the Folding paper and paperboard containers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2021 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2020 1.9 1.0 2 0 0
2019 4.1 1.6 5 0 0
2018 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2017 3.4 1.7 4 0 0
2016 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · OH · Cleveland

205 Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Monroe LA Plant 15 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foodservice : ST CHARLES 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cultech Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Malnove Incorporated of Nebraska 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Erie Construction Co. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE US162: Cleveland 515 - SG 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agrana Fruit US, Inc. Botkins 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millwork Brands Inc 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Aquatic Grabill 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoreline RTC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 021-GALLUP/CALMAR 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CR_Potelco 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florestone Madera 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nampa-Happy Valley #144 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaver Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iah - Dhl 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.