Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) · California

The Club SJC

San Jose, CA · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Club SJC runs at 426% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) workplace, earning a grade F.

The Club SJC: 12.8 TCR = 426% of Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Club SJC safety composite

The Club SJC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−61.7

2021→2023

The Club SJC injury rate improved

The Club SJC's TCR fell 61.7 from 87.3 in 2021 to 25.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 87.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=87.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=25.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 426% of ind

  • DART 25.6 DART
  • RANK #539/586
  • PHOTO 4021-000007056
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4021-000007056 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Club SJC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Club SJC averages 12.8 TCR (426% of the Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Club SJC TCR series: 2021=87.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=25.6 · BLS 3.0

Where The Club SJC falls in its industry

6,952 Food service contractors, conc establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #539 safest of 586 Food service contractors, conc employers in California.

The Club SJC (41 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Club SJC
The Club SJC (41 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

The Club SJC has fewer employees than the Food service contractors, concession ope median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 25.6 25.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 87.3 87.3 0 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · San Jose

6,952 Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4021-000007056 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT USMC E MH 2000 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ST VINCENT RIVERS 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000020846 SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR The Saunders Company 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Osseo Healthcare, LLC 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Mountain Rifle Barrel 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Maid Brigade of Arizona 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Glenellen 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4318/3339 - Holiday City Crossdock 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE KAI Build, LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Miscellaneous Erectors 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.