Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

The Courtyards at Pasadena

Pasadena, TX · ~119 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Courtyards at Pasadena runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Courtyards at Pasadena: 3.5 TCR = 55% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Courtyards at Pasadena safety composite

The Courtyards at Pasadena scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

The Courtyards at Pasadena injury rate improved

The Courtyards at Pasadena's TCR fell 5.6 from 6.5 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #408/1034
  • PHOTO Baptist Village J Ol…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baptist Village J Olan Jones Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

The Courtyards at Pasadena in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Courtyards at Pasadena averages 3.5 TCR (55% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Courtyards at Pasadena TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 6.5

Where The Courtyards at Pasadena falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #408 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

The Courtyards at Pasadena (119 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Courtyards at Pasadena
The Courtyards at Pasadena (119 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Courtyards at Pasadena has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2021 2.5 1.2 2 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 5.8 4.9 6 0 0
2018 7.8 6.8 8 0 0
2017 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2016 6.5 4.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Pasadena

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baptist Village J Olan Jones Center 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversicare of Oxford 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clairidge House 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Woodlands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Welsh 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles N White Construction 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOXX Modular Holdings, Inc. / Black Diamond Group Limited 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Utilities Inc. 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR N-TRAK Group, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversicare of Oxford 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brockton Mold 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dillard Lumber 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Erlanger CIN 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calcasieu Refining Company 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Auto Parts - PAWHSE 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mark T Sheehan High School 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.