Building cleaning services, janitorial · Michigan

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools

Oak Park, MI · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade D.

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools: 6.0 TCR = 132% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools safety composite

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2019→2021

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools injury rate improved

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools's TCR fell 2.1 from 5.8 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.8 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Oak Park, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 132% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #80/114
  • PHOTO Hyatt Regency Reston
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hyatt Regency Reston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools averages 6.0 TCR (132% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools TCR series: 2019=5.8 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.8 · BLS 4.5

Where The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 114 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Michigan.

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools (39 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools
The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools (39 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

The DM Burr Group - Oak Park Public Schools has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2020 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MI · Oak Park

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 37 employers in Oak Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency Reston 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / SMITHFIELD FOODS - SMITHFIELD 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maintenance of Austin, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hospital Metropolitano de San German 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brilar LLC 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkley Building Blocks, Avery Center 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norup International School 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administrative Office Tyndall Center 782 FTE
NAT-TCR HTI-New Comerstown 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Manufacturing 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Manorcare Camp Hill 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4818-KYOB 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rochester FS (SSS, CSS) 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Chester FS (SSS, CSS) 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mansea Metal, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shellys - Telford Truss 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.