Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center

Edina, MN · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center safety composite

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center held a steady TCR band

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Edina, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/419
  • PHOTO Culebra
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Culebra (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center falls in its industry

2,836 Otolaryngologists' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 419 Otolaryngologists' offices (e. employers in Minnesota.

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center
The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

The Ear Nose and Throat Clinic & Hearing Center has fewer employees than the Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., center median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Edina

2,836 Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 201 employers in Edina, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Culebra 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Urgent Care at Lake Lucille 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCH Medical Group - Roodhouse 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCH Medical Group - Carrollton 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Route 1 Logistics LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota TNH Protege dba Weed Man Lawn Care 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Excelsior Fire District 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Industries Distribution Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoenecker's Inc d.b.a BI WORLDWIDE 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Fire Protection Group 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 - Edina 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mace Avenue Project 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Electrical Testing & Construction LLC (IETC) 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE ChemTec Pest Control Corp. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Sprinkler Co., Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.