Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

New Hope, MN · ~153 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society: 4.4 TCR = 67% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society safety composite

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2022→2024

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society injury rate improved

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.1 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.1 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · New Hope, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.4 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #79/430
  • PHOTO A46 CYPRESS COVE CEN…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A46 CYPRESS COVE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society averages 4.4 TCR (67% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 6.5

Where The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (153 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (153 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 7.2 5.4 8 0 0
2022 4.1 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · New Hope

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A46 CYPRESS COVE CENTER 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Grove Care & Wellness 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Bennet Center for Rehabilitation and Healing 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 1865 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Care / Hospice 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Super Radiator Coils Chaska 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Student Wayzata 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Bronx River Houses 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1762 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Somerset Office 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Corpus 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin Machine Products 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christus St. Elizabeth Hospital - EVS 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coxreels 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duro Bag-Tolleson 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.