Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat transfer equipment) manufacturing · Minnesota

Super Radiator Coils Chaska

Chaska, MN · ~153 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Super Radiator Coils Chaska runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat transfer equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Super Radiator Coils Chaska: 7.6 TCR = 230% of Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat transfer equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Super Radiator Coils Chaska safety composite

Super Radiator Coils Chaska scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Super Radiator Coils Chaska: 6.7 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2022

Super Radiator Coils Chaska's TCR rose 2.5 from 6.7 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Chaska, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 230% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #19/22
  • PHOTO STULZ Air Technology…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STULZ Air Technology Systems, Inc. - Dayton, TN (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Super Radiator Coils Chaska in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Super Radiator Coils Chaska averages 7.6 TCR (230% of the Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat transfer equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Super Radiator Coils Chaska TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=6 · 2022=9.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Super Radiator Coils Chaska falls in its industry

461 Evaporative condensers (i.e., establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 22 Evaporative condensers (i.e., employers in Minnesota.

Super Radiator Coils Chaska (153 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Super Radiator Coils Chaska
Super Radiator Coils Chaska (153 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Super Radiator Coils Chaska has fewer employees than the Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat trans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.3 6.4 16 0 0
2021 6.0 5.4 10 0 0
2020 5.5 4.1 8 0 0
2019 10.3 6.0 17 0 0
2018 7.8 5.8 12 0 0
2016 6.7 5.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · MN · Chaska

461 Evaporative condensers (i.e., heat transfer equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 87 employers in Chaska, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STULZ Air Technology Systems, Inc. - Dayton, TN 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR APL Valencia 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peerless of America 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dakota Growers 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE McC 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stratasys (Edenvale) 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Medical 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 596 FTE
NAT-TCR Tanner Medical Center East Alabama 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100701 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cares Surgicenter LLC 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lozier Corporation - Joplin 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Granite State Plumbing & Heating 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otterbein St. Marys 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Transportation Inc. 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.