Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay

St. Petersburg, FL · ~208 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay: 7.4 TCR = 195% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay safety composite

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2022

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay injury rate improved

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay's TCR fell 1.8 from 9.3 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · St. Petersburg, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 195% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #155/283
  • PHOTO The Arbors at Stoneham
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arbors at Stoneham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay averages 7.4 TCR (195% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=7 · 2022=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay (208 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay
The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay (208 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.5 2.7 11 0 0
2021 7.0 3.9 9 0 0
2020 8.5 7.2 12 1 0
2019 4.5 3.9 7 1 0
2018 7.4 4.3 10 2 0
2017 7.6 1.8 11 2 0
2016 9.3 2.3 8 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · St. Petersburg

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 170 employers in St. Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Stoneham 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Run Lakeview 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning Pointe of Columbia 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoney River Ramsey 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison Orlando 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miami Facility 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Father's Table - Lake Mary 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE WINTER HAVEN, FL (Lakeland) 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital 3,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSN Headquarters 3,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Hospital (1105) 2,597 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Design Inc 2,047 FTE
NAT-TCR WDOH01 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iga #36 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunset LCC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosewood Estates 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Humphreys Half Moon Inn and Suites 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doss Enterprises L.C. 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE UNFI Rocklin 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLS Companies Brooklyn Park 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.