Grocery stores · Pennsylvania

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza

Philadelphia, PA · ~177 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grocery stores workplace, earning a grade C.

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza: 3.3 TCR = 96% of Grocery stores BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza safety composite

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza: 0.8 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #315/1287
  • PHOTO E.M. Heath Supermarket
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E.M. Heath Supermarket (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza averages 3.3 TCR (96% of the Grocery stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.9 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.4

Where The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery stores establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #315 safest of 1287 Grocery stores employers in Pennsylvania.

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza (177 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza
The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza (177 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

The Fresh Grocer of Progress Plaza has more employees than the Grocery stores median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2021 9.9 7.9 15 0 0
2020 5.3 3.3 8 0 0
2019 3.4 2.0 5 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · PA · Philadelphia

30,654 Grocery stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E.M. Heath Supermarket 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store #26 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison West 20 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEADVILLE 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CLEVELAND CLIFFS MONESSEN 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smooth-On Inc 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-10234000 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Stevens Transport, Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Rock 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandusky, Oh Branch 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Civil Werx LLC 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gainesville 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Phoenix, Inc 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Tallahassee, Inc 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE C038 Dayton 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.